تأثیر سیلاژ ذرت تلقیح شده با باکتری‌های مختلف بر عملکرد گاوهای شیرده هلشتاین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده علوم و مهندسی کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

چکیده

ذرت علوفه‌ای با 28 درصد ماده‌خشک برداشت، خردشده و پس از اعمال تیمارهای آزمایشی (106 کلنی به ازای گرم علوفه تازه) در کیسه‌های 30 کیلوگرمی سیلو شدند. تیمارهای آزمایشی عبارت بودند از: 1) سیلاژ بدون تلقیح میکروبی(شاهد)، 2) سیلاژ تلقیح‌شده با لاکتوباسیلوس ‌فرمنتوم تولیدشده در آزمایشگاه، 3) سیلاژ تلقیح‌شده با مخلوطی از  لاکتوباسیلوس ‌فرمنتوم، لاکتوباسیلوس ‌سالیواریوس، پدیوکوکوس ‌اسیدی‌لاکتیسی و انتروکوکوس ‌فاسیوم، تولیدشده در آزمایشگاه و 4) سیلاژ تلقیح‌شده با باکتری تجاری حاوی انتروکوکوس ‌فاسیوم، لاکتوباسیلوس ‌برویس و لاکتوباسیلوس ‌پلانتاروم. شانزده رأس گاو هلشتاین در اواسط شیردهی ( 0/10 ± 160 روز شیردهی) بر پایة طرح مربع‌لاتین ادغام شده 4 ×4 با دوره‌های 21 روزه استفاده شد. تولید شیر تیمارهای آزمایشی با شاهد تفاوتی نداشت ولی تولید شیر تصحیح‌شده بر اساس 5/3 درصد چربی در گاوهای دریافت‌کننده سیلاژ تلقیح‌شده بیشتر از شاهد بود. درصدهای چربی، پروتئین و مواد جامد بدون چربی شیر در تیمار اول بیشتر از گروه‌های دیگر بود. گاوهای تغذیه‌شده با سیلاژهای تلقیح‌شده آزمایشگاهی، مصرف ماده‌خشک بالاتری نسبت به شاهد و تیمار سوم داشتند. گوارش‌پذیری ماده‌خشک، پروتئین خام و الیاف نامحلول در شوینده اسیدی در تیمارهای تلقیح‌شده بالاتر از شاهد بود و بیشترین آن مربوط به تیمار دوم بود. غلظت نیتروژن آمونیاکی شکمبه در تیمارهای اول و دوم کمتر از شاهد بود. درصد استات شکمبه در شاهد و تیمار دوم بالاتر و پروپیونات در تیمارهای تلقیح شده بیشتر از شاهد بود. نتایج نشان داد تلقیح باکتریایی سیلاژ ذرت تاثیر معنی‌داری بر میزان تولید شیر نداشت هرچند شیر تصحیح‌شده 5/3 درصد چربی، درصدهای چربی و پروتئین شیر و گوارش‌پذیری مواد مغذی را افزایش داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of inoculated corn silage with different types of bacteria on Holstein lactating cows’ performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Bayat 1
  • Fardin Hozhabri 1
  • Daryoush Alipour 2
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Agricultural engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Corn fodder with 28% DM were harvested, chopped and after applying treatments (106 cfu g-1 FM) were ensiled in 30 kg bags. The experimental treatments were: 1) Silage without microbial inoculation (control), 2) silage inoculated with Lactobacillus fermentum produced in the laboratory (Lab), 3) silage inoculated with mixture of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Pediococcus acidilactici and Enterococcus faecium (Lab), and 4) silage inoculated with commercial bacteria containing Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus plantarum. Sixteen Holstein cows in the middle of lactation (160 ± 10 days of lactation) were used based on a 4 x 4 integrated Latin square design with periods of 21 days. The milk production of treatments was not significantly different from the control, but 3.5% fat corrected milk of cows receiving inoculated silage was more than the control. The percentages of milk fat, protein and solids- non-fat were higher in the first treatment than other groups (P<0.05). Cows fed with laboratory inoculated silages had a higher (P<0.05) DMI than control and third treatment. The digestibility of DM, CP and ADF was higher (P<0.05) in the inoculated treatments than control and the highest was related to the second treatment. The rumen ammonia nitrogen in the first and second treatments was lower (P<0.05) than control. The rumen percentage of acetate was higher (P<0.05) in control and the second treatment, and propionate was higher (P<0.05) in the inoculated treatments than control. The overall conclusion showed that the bacterial inoculation of corn silage had no significant effect on milk production, although it increased 3.5% fat corrected milk, percentages of milk fat and protein as well as digestibility of nutrients.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dry matter intake
  • Lactobacillus fermentum
  • Microbial inoculation
  • Milk composition
  • Milk yield

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Silage is actually a forage preserved through lactic acid fermentation and is an integral part of most dairy cattle diets in most countries of the world (Arriola et al., 2021). Inoculants, which are mainly composed of selected strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), have been used as silage additives all over the world and are the most common additives used to improve the fermentation process and silage quality (Bernardi et al., 2019). The response of livestock to the use of inoculants in silage is controversial. Some studies have observed an increase in milk production (Kung et al., 2003), while other studies have not identified a positive response (Arriola et al., 2021) or have observed a negative effect in this regard (Santos et al., 207). According to reviews, very limited studies have evaluated the effects of inoculating corn silage with newer inoculants containing mixtures of obligate homogenous fermenting and obligate or facultative heterogenous fermenting bacteria on dairy cow performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using bacterial inoculations containing heterogeneous fermenting bacteria alone or in combination with homogeneous and heterogeneous fermenting bacteria on the performance of dairy cows and nutrient digestibility.

 

Material and Methods

Corn fodder with 28% DM was harvested, cut into 2-3 cm pieces and after applying treatments (106 colonies per gram of fresh fodder) were ensiled in 30 kg bags for 260 days. The experimental treatments were: 1) Silage without microbial inoculation (control), 2) silage inoculated with Lactobacillus fermentum produced in the laboratory, 3) silage inoculated with mixture of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Pediococcus acidilactici and Enterococcus faecium, produced in the laboratory and 4) silage inoculated with commercial bacteria containing Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus plantarum. The concentrations of bacteria used in this experiment were prepared using the multiplication method in liquid MRS broth (MRS Broth) and turbidity and absorption measurement of the samples by a spectrophotometer. The inoculants were diluted in deionized water and sprayed on the fodder with a hand sprayer. A similar amount of deionized water was sprayed on the control fodder. In this experiment, 16 multiparous Holstein cows in the middle of the lactation with body weight of 630±17 kg, 160±10 days of lactation and milk production of 30±2.1 kg were placed in individual stalls with dimensions of 4x4 square meters and were randomly assigned to one of the treatments. Each experimental period was 21 days including 14 days of adaptation period and 7 days for sample collection. Milking was done three times a day at 6:00, 14:00 and 22:00, milk production was recorded daily and milk was sampled to determine milk composition. Ruminal fluid was taken through an esophageal tube using a vacuum pump on the 21st day of each period four hours after morning feeding to determine pH, ammonia nitrogen and volatile fatty acid concentrations. The acid-insoluble ash internal indicator method was used to determine the digestibility of dry matter, crude protein and insoluble fibers in neutral detergent. This experiment was based on a 4x4 integrated Latin square design with four experimental treatments, four periods and four cows in each treatment. All the collected data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (version 9.4) by mixed analysis procedure. Mean treatments were also compared using Duncan's test at a significance level of five percent.

 

Results and discussion

The milk production of treatments was not significantly different from the control, but 3.5% fat corrected milk of cows receiving inoculated silage was more than the control. The percentages of milk fat, protein and solids nonfat were higher in the first treatment than other groups. Cows fed with laboratory inoculated silages had a higher (P<0.05) dry matter intake than control and third treatment. The digestibility of dry mater, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber was higher (P<0.05) in the inoculated treatments than control and the highest was related to the second treatment. The rumen ammonia nitrogen in the first and second treatments was lower (P<0.05) than control. The rumen percentage of acetate was higher (P<0.05) in control and the second treatment, and propionate was higher (P<0.05) in the inoculated treatments than control.

 

Conclusions

The results of current study showed that the bacterial inoculation of corn silage had no significant effect on the milk production, although it increased 3.5% fat corrected milk, the percentages of milk fat and protein as well as the digestibility of nutrients.

آقامحمدی، ناهید، هژبری، فردین و علیپور، داریوش (1400). پایداری هوازی سیلاژ ذرت تلقیح شده با جدایه‌های جدید باکتری اسید لاکتیک جدا شده از منابع مختلف. نشریه پژوهش های علوم دامی ایران، 14 (3)، 377-359.
 
REFERENCES
Aghamohamadi, N., Hozhabri, F., & Alipour, D. (2022). Aerobic stability of corn silages inoculated with novel isolate of lactic acid bacteria separated from various sources. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 14(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.22067/ijasr.2021.68168.1003. (In Persian).
Andrade, F. L., Rodrigues, J. P. P., Detmann, E., Campos Valadares Filho, S., Castro, M. M. D., Trece, A. S., Silva, T. E., Fischer, V., Weiss, K., & Marcondes, M. I. (2016). Nutritional and productive performance of dairy cows fed corn silage or sugarcane silage with or without additives. Tropical Animal Health & Production, 48,747–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1020-y.
AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. Vol. I. 17th Ed. AOAC International, Arlington.
Arriola, K. J., Oliveira, A. S., Jiang, Y., Kim, D., Silva, H. M., Kim, S. C., Amaroand, F. X., & Adesogan, A. T. (2021). Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without other bacteria, on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104, 7653–7670. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19647.
Bayatkouhsar, J., Tahmasebi, A. M. & Naserian, A. A. (2011) The effects of microbial inoculation of corn silage on performance of lactating dairy cows. Livestock Science. 142:170–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.07.007.
Ben-Meir, Y. A., Jami, E., Portnik, Y., Yaacoby, S., Chen, Y., Ogunade, I. M., Adesogan, A. T. & Weinberg, Z. G. (2018). Effect of silage inoculants on the quality of baled whole-crop wheat silages and milking cow performance, Grassland Science. 64:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12196.
Bernardi, A., Harter, C. J., Silva, A. W. L., Reis, R. A. & Rabelo, C. H. S. (2019). A meta-analysis examining lactic acid bacteria inoculants for maize silage: Effects on fermentation, aerobic stability, nutritive value and livestock production, Grass Forage Science. 74:596–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12452.
Broderick, G. A. & Kang, J. H. (1980). Automated simultaneous determination ammonia and total acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 63:64-65. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (80)82888-8.
Ellis, J. L., Hindrichsen, I. K., Klop, G., Kinley, R. D., Milora, N., Bannink, A. & Djikstra, J. (2016) Effects of lactic acid bacteria silage inoculation on methane emission and productivity of Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 99:7159–7174. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10754.
Fellner, V., Phillip, L. E., Sebastian, S., Idziak, E. S. (2001). Effects of a bacterial inoculant and propionic acid on preservation of high moisture ear corn, and on rumen fermentation, digestion and growth of beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 81: 273–280. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-112.
Gerlach, K., Daniel, J. L. P., Jobim, C. C. & Nussio, L. G. (2021). A data analysis on the effect of acetic acid on dry matter intake in dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 272. Article 114782 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114782.
Han, H., Ogata, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Nagao, S., & Nishino, N. (2014). Identification of lactic acid bacteria in the rumen and feces of dairy cows fed total mixed ration silage to assess the survival of silage bacteria in the gut. Journal of Dairy Science, 97: 5754–5762. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-7968.
Huhtanen, P., Nousiainen, J. I., Khalili, H., Jaakkola, S., Heikkila, T. (2003). Relationships between silage fermentation characteristics and milk production parameters: analyses of literature data. Livestock Production Science, 81: 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226 (02)00195-1.
Kung, L., Taylor, C. C., Lynch, M. P. & Neylon, J. M. (2003) The effect of treating alfalfa with Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86:336–343. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (03)73611-X.
NRC. (2001). National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th revised ed., National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
Oliveira, A. S., Weinberg, Z. G., Ogunade, I. M., Cervantes, A. A. P., Arriola, K. G., Jiang, Y., Kim, D., Li, X., Goncalves, M. C. M., Vyas, D. & Adesogan, A. T. (2017). Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 100:4587–4603. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11815.
Ottensin, D. M. & Butler, D. A. (1971). Improved gas chromatography separation of feed acids C2-C5 in solution. Analytical Chemistry, V43:P.952-955.
Rabelo, C. H. S, Basso, F. C., Lara, E. C., Jorge, L. G. O., Härter, C. J., Mesquita, L.G., Silva, L. F. P. & Reis, R. A. (2018). Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri as a silage inoculant and as a probiotic on feed intake, apparent digestibility and ruminal fermentation and microbiology in wethers fed low‐dry‐matter whole‐crop maize silage. Grass and Forage Science, 73, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12303.
Santos, W. P., Ávila, C. L. S., Pereira, M. N., Schwan, R. F., Lopes, N. M. & Pinto, J. C. (2017). Effect of the inoculation of sugarcane silage with Lactobacillus hilgardii and Lactobacillus buchneri on feeding behavior and milk yield of dairy cows Journal of Animal Science, 95:4613–4622. https://doi.org/ 10.2527/jas2017.1526.
Van Keulen, J. V. & Young, B. A. (1977). Evaluation of acid insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science, 44 (2), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x.
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. & Lewis, B. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (91)78551-2.
Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., Chen, W., Zhou, Z., Meng, Q. & Wu, H. (2019). Effects of adding various silage additives to whole corn crops at ensiling on performance, rumen fermentation, and serum physiological characteristics of growing-finishing cattle. Animals, 9: 695-707. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090695