تأثیر سطوح مختلف پروتئین جیره و نانویاور (نانوادجوانت) بر عملکرد، ویژگی‌های لاشه و پاسخ ایمنی جوجه‌های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی سابق کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم دامی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه علوم دامی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

چکیده

این آزمایش به مدت 42 روز با استفاده از 240 قطعه جوجۀ گوشتی یک‌روزۀ سویۀ راس 308، در قالب آزمون فاکتوریل 2×3 با سه سطح پروتئین (پایین، متوسط و بالا) و دو سطح نانو­یاور (حاوی نانویاور و بدون آن) با شش تیمار و چهار تکرار و ده قطعه جوجه در هر تکرار در قالب یک طرح کامل تصادفی انجام شد. اثرگذاری اصلی سطح پروتئین جیره در دورۀ آغازین و رشد بر خوراک مصرفی معنی­دار بود (05/0P<). در رابطه با افزایش وزن روزانه نیز تنها اثرگذاری اصلی سطح پروتئین جیره در دورۀ آغازین، رشد و کل دوره معنی­دار شد (01/0P<). در مورد ضریب تبدیل خوراک هم تنها اثرگذاری اصلی سطح پروتئین جیره در دورۀ آغازین معنی­دار بود (01/0P<). اثر اصلی سطح پروتئین جیره برای وزن نسبی (درصد از وزن زنده) لاشه، ران، میزان چربی حفرۀ شکمی و بورس معنی­دار بود (05/0P<). از نظر عیار پادتن (تیتر آنتی­بادی) علیه SRBC، در 28 روزگی اثر اصلی سطح پروتئین جیره و نانو­یاور بر عیار پادتن تام، IgG و IgM معنی­دار بود (05/0P<). سامانة ایمنی یاخته‌ای در پاسخ به تزریق PHA-P تحت تأثیر تیمارها قرار نگرفت. به‌عنوان نتیجه­گیری کلی، جیره­های با سطوح بالای پروتئین توان بیشتری را به‌منظور بهبود عملکرد تولیدی و ایمنی جوجه­ها در مقایسه با جیره‌های با سطوح متوسط و پایین از خود نشان دادند. افزون بر این، وجود نانو­یاور منجر به تحریک پاسخ ایمنی هومورال جوجه­های گوشتی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of protein density and nano-adjuvant on performance, carcass characteristics and immune response of broiler chickens

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Aziz Ali-Abadi 1
  • Hassan Darmani Kuhi 2
  • Mehrdad Mohammadi 2
1 Former M. Sc. Student, Department of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. P.O.Box: 58643-41889
2 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. P.O.Box: 58643-41889
چکیده [English]

An experiment was conducted on 240 one-day old Ross 308 broiler chicks using a completely randomized design in a 2×3 factorial arrangement with two levels of nano-adjuvant (with and without) and three levels of dietary protein (low, medium and high) during a 42 d experimental period. The main effect of protein density on feed intake was significant during the starter and grower periods (P<0.05). With regard to body weight gain, the main effect of protein density was significant in the starter, grower and whole experimental periods (P<0.01). Among the main and interaction effects, only the main effect of protein density on feed conversion ratio in the starter period was significant (P<0.01). The effect of protein density was also significant on the relative weights of carcass, legs, abdominal fat pad and bursa of Fabricius (P<0.05). The main effects of the protein density and nano-adjuvant for total anti-SRBC and IgG titers were significant at day 28 (P<0.05). Cell immunity in response to PHA-P injection was not affected by the factors. As an overall conclusion, diets with high protein density showed a better ability in improving the performance and immune response of broiler chicks compared to the diets with medium and low protein density. Also, the results showed some advantages for nano-adjuvant in humoral immune response stimulation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • carcass characteristics
  • immune response
  • nano-adjuvant
  • performance
  • protein density

مراجع

  1. Abbasi, M., Mahdavi, M. & Nazaran, M. H. (2014). The new nano-complex, Hep-c, improves the immunogenicity of the hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine, 31(22), 2591-2597.
  2. Afrin, F. & Anam, K. (2000). Induction of partial protection against Leishmania donovani by promastigote antigens in negativelychargedliposomes. Parasitology, 86, 730-735.
  3. Ahmadi Chelchele, A., Purreza, J., Vli, N. & Kheiri, F. (2011). Different levels of threonine and protein on performance and carcass characteristics in broilers material from age 49 to 9 days. Journal of Veterinary Pathobiology, 4(13), 19-23. (in Farsi)
  4. Aletor, V. A., Hamid, I. I., Nies, E. & Feffer, E. (2000). Low protein, amino acids supplemented diets in broiler chickens: Effect on performance, carcass characteristics, whole body composition and efficiencies of nutrient utilization. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80, 547-554.
  5. Azghadi, M., Kermanshahi, H. & Golian, A. (2013). The effect of dietary energy and protein levels on growth performance and antibody responses of offspring of laying japans quails. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4, 185-190.
  6. Banerjee, G. C. (1992). Poultry. (3rd edition). Oxford and IBI publishing co. New Delhi. pp. 168-172.
  7. Cheema, M.A., Qureshi, M.A., Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R. & Nestor, K.E. (2006). A Comparison of the immune response of 2003 commercial turkeys and a 1966 random bred strain when fed representative 2003 and 1966 turkey diet. Poultry Science, 86, 241-248.
  8. Dairo, F.A.S., Adesehinwa, A. O. K., Oluwasola, T. A. & Oluyemi, J. A. (2010). High and low dietary energy and protein levels for broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 82, 1134-1139.
  9. Darsi, E., Shivazad, M., Zaghari, M. & Namroud, N. (2009). Effect of L-carnitine in diets containing low levels of protein on performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. In: Proceeding of the4thIranian Congress of Animal Science, Tehran-Iran. (in Farsi)
  10. Dietert, R. R. (2009). Immunotoxicity; Testing Methods and Protocols. Chapter, 25, 387-398.
  11. Eits, R. M., Kwakkel, R. P., Verstegen, M. W. A. & Den Hartog, L. A. (2005). Dietary balance protein in broiler chickens. A flexible and practical tool to predict does-response curves. Poultry Science, 46, 300-309.
  12. Esmail, S. H. M. (1999). Energy utilization by broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 38, 60-62.
  13. Fakharzadeh, S., Kalanaky, S., Hafizi, M., Goya, M. M., Masoumi, Z., Namaki, S., Shakeri, N., Abbasi, M., Mahdavi, M. & Nazaran, M. H. (2013). The new nano-complex, Hep-c, improves the immunogenicity of the hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine, 31(22), 2591-2597.
  14. Golian, A. M., Azghadi, A. & Pilevar, M. (2010). Influence of various levels of energy and protein on performance and humoral immune responses in broiler chicks. Global Veterinaria, 4(5), 434-440.
  15. Gupta, R. K. & Siber G. R. 1995. Adjuvants for human vaccines; current status, problems and future prospects. Vaccine, 13: 1263-1276.
  16. Houshmand, M., Azhar, K., Zulkifli, I., Bejo, M. H. & Kamyab, A. (2012). Effect of prebiotic, protein and stocking density on performance, immunity and stress indicators of broilers. Poultry Science, 91, 393-401.
  17. Jahanian, R. & Nasiri-Moghaddam, H. (2008). Response performance and immunological of broiler chickens to dietary threonine and protein level changes. The 3rd IranianAnimal Science Congress, Mashhad-Iran. (in Farsi)
  18. Jahanian, R. (2009). Effect of dietary arginine on different subsets of blood serum proteins and immune responses in broilers. The 4th Iranian Congress of Animal Science, Tehran-Iran. (in Farsi)
  19. Kidd, M. T. (2004). Nutritional modulation of immune function in broiler. Poultry Science, 83, 650-657.
  20. Klasing, K. C. (1988). Influence of acute starvation or acute excess intake on immune competence of broiler chicks, Poultry Science, 67, 628-636.
  21. Klasing, K. C. (2007). Nutrition and immune system. Gordon memorial lecture. British Poultry Science, 48, 525-537.
  22. Kwak, H., Austic A. C. & Dietert, R. R. (2001). Arginine-genotype interaction and immune status. Nutrition Research, 21, 1035-1044.
  23. Lindblad, E. B. (2004). Aluminum compounds for use in vaccines. Immunology and Cell Biology, 82, 497-505.
  24. Lochmiller, R. L. & Deerenberg, C. (2000). Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: Just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos, 88, 87-98.
  25. Mahdavi. M., Ebtekar, M., Azadmanesh, K., Mahboudi, F., Khoramkhorshid, H. R., Rahbarizadeh, F., Nezhadmoghadam, E. & Mohamadhasan, Z. (2009). Immunological assessment of HIV-1-P24-Nef peptide vaccine with adjuvant mono phosphorylation lipid A in mice, BALB/C. Modares Journal of Medical Sciences: Pathology, 13(2), 79-86. (in Farsi)
  26. Namroud, N.F., Shivazad, M. & Zaghari, M. (2008). Effects of fortifying low crude protein diet with crystalline amino acids on performance, blood, ammonia level and excreta characteristics of broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 87, 2250-2258.
  27. National Research Council. (1994). Nutritional requirements of poultry. 9th Rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  28. Noy, Y. & Sklan, D. (2002). Nutrient use in chicks during the first week post-hatch. Poultry Science, 81, 76-100.
  29. Noy, Y., Geyra, A. & Sklan, D. (2001). The effect of early feeding on growth and small intestinal development in the post-hatch poultry. Poultry Science, 8, 76-100.
  30. Rezaei, M., NassiriMoghadam, H., Pour Reza, J. & Kermanshahi, H. (2004). The effect of dietary protein and lysine levels on broiler performance, carcass characteristics and nitrogen excretion. Poultry Science, 3, 148-152.
  31. Roy, S. C., Alam, M. S., Ali, M. A., Chowdhury, S. D. & Goswami, C. (2010). Different levels of protein on the performance of synthetic broiler. Veterinary Medicine, 8(2), 117-122.
  32. Sadat, S. M., Zabihollahi, R., Javadi, F., Vahabpour, R., Siadat, S. D., Azadmanesh, K., Moshiri, A., Parivar, K. & Aghasadeghi, M. H. (2010). Immunological evaluation of recombinant HIV-1 virions new adjuvant in mice. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 21(84), 13-21. (in Farsi)
  33. Salahi Moghaddam, R., Maghsoudloo, S. H., Mostafaloo, Y., Shahir, M. H. & Bayat kouhsar, J. (2014). Effect of formulation and feed protein levels on performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. Journal of Animal Production, 4, 23-37. (in Farsi)
  34. Si, J., Fritts, C. A., Burnham, D. J. & Waldroup, P. W. (2001). Relationship of dietary lysine level to the concentration of all essential amino acids in broiler diets. Poultry Science, 80, 1472-1479.
  35. Solangi, A. A., Baloch, G. M., Wagan, P. K., Chachar, B. & Memon, A. (2003). Effects of different levels of dietary protein on the growth of broiler. Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5, 301-304.
  36. Iran's Minister of Jihad-e-Agriculture. (2010). http://www.agri-jahad.ir. (in Farsi)
  37. Sterling, K. G., Pesti, G. M. & Bakalli, R. I. (2003). Performance of broiler chicks fed various levels of dietary lysine and crude protein. Poultry Science, 82, 1939-1947.
  38. Tsiagbe, V. K., Cook, M. E., Harper, A. E. & Sunde, M. L. (1987). Enhanced immune responses in broiler chicks fed methionine-supplemented diets. Poultry Science, 66, 1147-1154.
  39. Wang, W. & Singh, M. (2011). Selection of adjuvants for enhanced vaccine potency. Vaccine, 21, 33-78.
  40. Wintergerst, E. S., Maggini, S. & Hornig, D. H. (2007). Contribution of selected vitamins and trace elements to immune function. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 51, 301-323.
  41. Ma, X., Guo, Z., Wang, D., Hu, Y. & Shen, Z. (2010). Effects of sulfated polysaccharides and their prescriptions on immune response of ND vaccine in chickens. Carbohydrate Polymers, 82, 9-13.
  42. Zhang, L., Jin, N., Song, Y., Wang, H., Ma, H., Li, Z. & Jiang, W. (2007). Construction and characterization of a recombinant fowl pox virus containing HIV-1 multi-epitope-p24 chimeric gene in mice. Science in China Series C: Life Science, 50, 212-220.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 04 دی 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 04 اردیبهشت 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 27 مرداد 1395

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار