اثر سطوح مختلف اسیدیفایر در آب آشامیدنی روی عملکرد رشد، برخی فراسنجه‌های خونی و جمعیت میکروبی سکوم جوجه‌های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی قائمشهر، ساری، ایران

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ورامین پیشوا، ایران.

چکیده

این تحقیق به‌منظور بررسی اثرات سطوح مختلف اسیدیفایر در آب آشامیدنی بر عملکرد رشد، برخی فراسنجه­های خونی و جمعیت میکروبی سکوم در جوجه‌های گوشتی انجام شد. در این آزمایش از 240 قطعه جوجه یکروزه گوشتی (مخلوط هر دو جنس‌) سویه راس 308  به مدت 42 روز استفاده شد. جوجه‌ها به 4 گروه (تیمار) که هر تیمار دارای 6 پن و در هر پن 10 پرنده بود به‌طور تصادفی بر اساس میانگین وزن یکسان در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی تقسیم شدند. جیره­های آزمایشی شامل، 1- شاهد (فاقد اسیدیفایر)، 2- تیمار ۲۰۰ میلی­لیتر اسیدیفایر در ۱۰۰۰ لیتر آب آشامیدنی، 3- تیمار ۴۰۰ میلی­لیتر اسیدیفایر در ۱۰۰۰ لیترآب آشامیدنی و 4- تیمار ۶۰۰ میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر در ۱۰۰۰ لیتر آب آشامیدنی بودند. نتایج نشان داد که در مصرف خوراک، تیمارهای حاوی 400 و 600 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر نسبت به گروه شاهد و تیمار حاوی 200 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر دارای بالاترین مصرف خوراک در دوره آغازین، پایانی و کل دوره بودند (05/0>p). در افزایش وزن بدن، تیمارهای حاوی 400 و 600 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر نسبت به گروه شاهد و تیمار حاوی 200 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر دارای بالاترین افزایش وزن بدن در دروه آغازین، رشد و کل دوره بودند (05/0>p). در ضریب تبدیل خوراک، تیمارهای حاوی 400 و 600 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر نسبت به گروه شاهد و تیمار حاوی 200 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر در دروه رشد دارای پایین‌ترین ضریب تبدیل خوراک بودند (05/0>p). در صفات لاشه، تیمارهای حاوی 400 و 600 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر نسبت به گروه شاهد و تیمار حاوی 200 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر دارای بالاترین درصد لاشه، درصد سینه و درصد ران‌ها بودند (05/0>p). در فراسنجه‌های خونی، تیمارهای حاوی 200، 400 و 600 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر نسبت به گروه شاهد دارای بالاترین غلظت گلوکز و HDL و نیز پایین‌ترین غلظت تری‌گلیسرید خون بودند (05/0>p). در جمعیت میکروبی سکوم، تیمارهای حاوی 200، 400 و 600 میلی‌لیتر اسیدیفایر نسبت به گروه شاهد دارای پایین‌ترین جمعیت باکتری کلی‌فرم بودند (05/0>p). به‌طور کلی، نتایج این آزمایش نشان داد که افزودن اسیدیفایر در سطوح 400 و 600 میلی‌لیتر در آب آشامیدنی سبب بهبود عملکرد رشد، خصوصیات کمی لاشه و کاهش جمعیت باکتری کلی‌فرم سکوم جوجه‌های گوشتی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of different levels of acidifier in drinking water on growth performance, certain blood parameters, and cecal microbial population in broiler chickens

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Reza Mirkarimi 1
  • Mohsen Hajipour 1
  • zahra Mahboubi 2
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Qaemshahr Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran.
2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Varamin-Pishva Islamic Azad University, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effects of different levels of acidifier in drinking water on growth performance, certain blood parameters, and cecal microbial population in broiler chickens. A total of 240 one-day-old mixed-sex broiler chickens (Ross 308 strain) were raised for 42 days in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 6 replicates, with 10 broiler chickens per cage. The experimental diets included:Control (no acidifier), Treatment with 200 ml acidifier in 1000 liters of drinking water, Treatment with 400 ml acidifier in 1000 liters of drinking water, Treatment with 600 ml acidifier in 1000 liters of drinking water.Results on feed intake showed significant differences among the experimental treatments in the starter, grower, and overall periods (p<0.05). Body weight gain showed significant differences among the experimental treatments in the starter, grower, and overall periods compared to the control (p<0.05), leading to improved feed conversion ratio among the experimental treatments (p<0.05). Carcass trait results showed significant differences in carcass percentage, breast percentage, and thigh percentage among the experimental treatments (p<0.05). Blood parameter results indicated significant differences in the concentrations of glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL among the experimental treatments (p<0.05). Significant differences were observed in the population of coliform bacteria among the experimental treatments (p<0.05). Consequently, different levels of acidifier in drinking water were effective in improving growth performance and carcass traits in broiler chickens.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organic acids
  • Growth performance
  • Cecal microbial population
  • Broiler chicken

Extended Abstract

Introduction

The risks associated with antibiotics have prompted researchers and poultry industry stakeholders to seek a suitable alternative to antibiotics that can stimulate rapid growth in broiler chickens while posing fewer threats to the health of farm animals and, consequently, the well-being of the final consumer (humans). The disruption of the microbial balance in the digestive system of animals consuming antibiotics and their feed eliminates the benefits of antibiotics for the host animals. When antibiotics are used in poultry diets, there is a possibility of transferring antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains to humans, which can result in humans becoming resistant to certain types of therapeutic antibiotics. Another disadvantage of using antibiotics in poultry diets is that they increase the pH of the gastrointestinal contents, thus hindering the digestion and absorption of better-processed nutrients in an acidic environment.

Materials and methods

   To investigate the effects of different levels of acidifier in drinking water on growth performance, specific blood parameters, and cecal microbial population in broiler chickens, 240 one-day-old (mixed-sex) broiler chickens (Ross 308 strain) were randomly assigned to 4 treatments with six replicates each, and 10 birds per cage for a 42-day rearing period. The experimental diets included: 1) control (no acidifier), 2) 200 ml acidifier in 1000 liters of drinking water, 3) 400 ml acidifier in 1000 liters of drinking water, and 4) 600 ml acidifier in 1000 liters of drinking water. Weighing of chicks and also measuring the amounts of feed consumed (in mesh form) was done for all experimental units during the periods of 1 to 10 days, 11 to 24 days, and 25 to 42 days.These data were used to calculate daily weight gain (BWG), daily feed consumption, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) for the specified periods. To investigate the characteristics of carcass parts and the microbial population of the cecum of broiler chickens, at the end of the experiment (42 days of age), one male and one female chicken were selected from each replicate with a body weight close to the average weight of the replicate. After 4 to 5 hours of starvation (to minimize the effect of the weight of the digestive tract contents and emptying), they were weighed again and slaughtered by the neck-splitting method.

 

Results and Discussion

   The results showed that in feed consumption, the treatments containing 400 and 600 ml of acidifier had the highest feed consumption during the starter, finisher, and total periods compared to the control group and the treatment with 200 ml of acidifier (p<0.05). In body weight gain, the treatments containing 400 and 600 ml of acidifier had the highest body weight gain during the starter, grower, and total periods compared to the control group and the treatment with 200 ml of acidifier (p<0.05). In feed conversion ratio, the treatments containing 400 and 600 ml of acidifier had the lowest feed conversion ratio during the grower period compared to the control group and the treatment with 200 ml of acidifier (p<0.05). In carcass traits, the treatments containing 400 and 600 ml of acidifier had the highest carcass percentage, breast percentage, and thigh percentage compared to the control group and the treatment with 200 milliliters of acidifier (p<0.05). In blood parameters, the treatments containing 200, 400, and 600 ml of acidifier had the highest glucose and HDL concentrations, as well as the lowest blood triglyceride concentration compared to the control group (p<0.05). In the cecal microbiota population, the treatments containing 200, 400, and 600 ml of acidifier had the lowest coliform bacteria populations compared to the control group (p<0.05).

 

Conclusion

Overall, the results of this study indicated that adding an acidifier at levels of 400 and 600 ml in drinking water improved growth performance, carcass quantitative traits, and reduced coliform bacteria populations in the ceca of broiler chicks.

 

Author Contributions

Seyed Reza Mirkarimi, Mohsen Hajipour, and Zahra Mahboubi contributed to conception, design, data collection, statistical analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version for submission.

Data Availability Statement

This article contains all the data that were created or evaluated during the research.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely thank the members of Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Qaemshahr Islamic Azad University for the approval and support of this research.

Ethical considerations

All of the protocols were approved by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine's Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments at Qaemshahr Islamic Azad University (IR-10721435972006).

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES
Abou-Ashour, A. M. H., El-Naga, A., Manal, K., & Hussein, E. A. (2020). Effect of dietary supplementation with some organic acids on the performance of broiler chickens. Menoufia Journal of Animal Poultry and Fish Production, 4(6), 131-132.‏ https://doi.org/10.21608/mjapfp.2020.171549.
Ali, A. M., Elagrb, H. M., Hamoud, M. M., Gamal, A. M., Mousa, M. R., Nasr, S. A. E., & Ali, M. M. (2020). Effect of acidified drinking water by organic acids on broiler performance and gut health. Adv. Animal Veterinary Science, 8(12), 1301-1309.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.12.1301.1309.
Al-Ghamdi, E. S. (2023). Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and blood biochemical indices of broilers affected by dietary organic acids blend’s supplementation. Animal Biotechnology, 34(7), 2059-2064.  https://doi.org /10.1080/10495398.2022.2068025.
Anand, N., Savaliya, F. P., Patel, A. B., & Bhagora, U. (2018). Effects of dietary supplementation of acidifier as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoter on feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and economics of broilers chickens. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 53(3), 296-308. https://doi.org /10.5958/0974-8180.2018.00063.6.
Aziz, A. A. (2010). Effect of organic acids on body weight, serum total protein, total cholesterol, glucose and cecal colonization of Salmonella spp. of broilers. AL-Qadisiya Journal ofVeterinary and Medical Science, 5, 69-77.‏
Aziz, A. A. A., Aziz, E. S. A. A., Khairy, M. H., Fadel, C., Giorgi, M., & Abdelaziz, A. S. (2024). The effect of butyric acid and nucleotides supplementation on broiler (Gallus gallus domesticus) growth performance, immune status, intestinal histology, and serum parameters. Open Veterinary Journal, 14(1), 324. https://doi.org /10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.29.
Brzoska, F., Śliwiński, B., & Michalik-Rutkowska, O. (2013). Effect of dietary acidifier on growth, mortality, post-slaughter parameters and meat composition of broiler chickens. Animals of Animal Science, 13(1), 85-96.‏ https://doi.org /10.2478/v10220-012-0061-z.
Biggs, P., & Parsons, C. M. (2008). The effects of several organic acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibilities, and cecal microbial populations in young chicks. Poultry Science, 87(12), 2581-2589.‏ https://doi.org /10.3382/ps.2008-00080.
Byrd, J. A., Hargis, B. M., Caldwell, D. J., Bailey, R. H., Herron, K. L., McReynolds, J. L., & Kubena, L. F. (2001). Effect of lactic acid administration in the drinking water during preslaughter feed withdrawal on Salmonella and Campylobacter contamination of broilers. Poultry Science, 80(3), 278-283.‏ https://doi.org /10.1093/ps/80.3.278.
Castanon, J. I. R. (2007). History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poultry Science, 86(11), 2466-2471. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00249.
Denli, M. (2003). Effect of dietary probiotic, organic acid and antibiotic supplementations to diets on broiler performance and carcass yield. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2(2), 96-98.  https://doi.org10.3923/pjn.2003.89.91.
Elnaggar, A. S., & El-kelawy, M. (2024). Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters of broiler chickens fed a diet supplemented with organic acids. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 44(1), 87-110.‏ https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2024.348121.
Fik, M., Hrnčár, C., Hejniš, D., Hanusová, E., Arpášová, H., & Bujko, J. (2021). The effect of citric acid on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 54(1), 187-187.‏
Fascina, V. B., Sartori, J. R., Gonzales, E., Carvalho, F. B. D., Souza, I. M. G. P. D., Polycarpo, G. D. V., & Pelícia, V. C. (2012). Phytogenic additives and organic acids in broiler chicken diets. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41, 2189-2197. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012001000008.
Gao, C. Q., Shi, H. Q., Xie, W. Y., Zhao, L. H., Zhang, J. Y., Ji, C., & Ma, Q. G. (2021). Dietary supplementation with acidifiers improves the growth performance, meat quality and intestinal health of broiler chickens. Animal Nutrition, 7(3), 762-769.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.01.005.
Ghazalah, A. A., Atta, A. M., Elkloub, K., Moustafa, M. E. L., & Riry, F. S. (2011). Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids on performance, nutrients digestibility and health of broiler chicks.‏ Journal of Poultry Science, 10(3), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.176.184.
Guo, Y. J., Wang, Z. Y., Wang, Y. S., Chen, B., Huang, Y. Q., Li, P., & Chen, W. (2022). Impact of drinking water supplemented 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutyric acid in combination with acidifier on performance, intestinal development, and microflora in broilers. Poultry Science, 101(3), 101661.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101661.
Gunal, M., Yayli, G., Kaya, O., Karahan, N., & Sulak, O. (2006). The effects of antibiotic growth promoter, probiotic or organic acid supplementation on performance, intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5(2), 149-155.‏ https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.149.155.
Hamid, H., Shi, H. Q., Ma, G. Y., Fan, Y., Li, W. X., Zhao, L. H., ... & Ma, Q. G. (2018). Influence of acidified drinking water on growth performance and gastrointestinal function of broilers. Poultry Science, 97(10), 3601-3609. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey212.
Han, M., Chen, B., Dong, Y., Miao, Z., Su, Y., Liu, C., & Li, J. (2023). Evaluation of liquid organic acids on the performance, Chyme pH, nutrient utilization, and gut microbiota in broilers under high stocking density. Animals, 13(2), 257.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020257.
Haque, M. N., Chowdhury, R., Islam, K. M. S., & Akbar, M. A. (2009). Propionic acid is an alternative to antibiotics in poultry diet. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 38(1-2), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v38i1-2.9920.
Haque, M. N., Islam, K. M., Akbar, M. A., Chowdhury, R., Khatun, M., Karim, M. R., & Kemppainen, B. W. (2010). Effect of dietary citric acid, flavomycin and their combination on the performance, tibia ash and immune status of broiler. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 90(1), 57-63.‏ https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS09048.
Hernandez, F., Garcia, V., Madrid, J., Orengo, J., Catalá, P., & Megias, M. D. (2006). Effect of formic acid on performance, digestibility, intestinal histomorphology and plasma metabolite levels of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 47(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500475574.
Hesabi Nameghi, A., Nasari Nejad, A., & Afkhami, M. (2023). Comparison of manufactured acidifier based citric acid with commercial sample in drinking water on performance, serum biochemical parameters, pH and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Research on Animal Production, 14(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.61186/rap.14.39.1. (In Persian).
Hossain, M. E., & Nargis, F. (2016). Supplementation of organic acid blends in water improves growth, meat yield, dressing parameters and bone development of broilers.‏ Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 45(1): 7-18. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v45i1.27482.
Hussein, E. O. S., Suliman, G. M., Alowaimer, A. N., Ahmed, S. H., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Taha, A. E., & Swelum, A. A. (2020). Growth, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broilers fed a low-energy diet supplemented with a multienzyme preparation. Poultry Science, 99(4), 1988-1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.09.007.
Islam, Z., Sultan, A., Khan, S., Khan, K., Jan, A. U., Aziz, T., & Alasmari, A. F. (2024). Effects of an organic acids blend and coated essential oils on broiler growth performance, blood biochemical profile, gut health, and nutrient digestibility. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 23(1), 152-163.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2023.2297562.
Iqbal, H., Rahman, A., Khanum, S., Arshad, M., Badar, I. H., Asif, A. R., & Iqbal, M. A. (2021). Effect of essential oil and organic acid on performance, gut health, bacterial count and serological parameters in broiler. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 23(03), eRBCA-2021.‏ https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2021-1443.
Jia, G., Yan, J. Y., Cai, J. Y. & Wang, K. N. (2010). Effects of encapsulated and non-encapsulated compound acidifiers on gastrointestinal pH and intestinal morphology and function in weaning piglets. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 19(1), 81-92.  https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/66272/2010.
Khan, S., Sultan, A., Muhammad, A., Imtiaz, N., Mobashar, M., Khan, H., & Inam, M. (2013). Lower illeal microflora and growth performance of broilers supplemented with organic acid blend (Aciflex®) during starter phase. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(12), 794-800. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2013.3.102913935.
Khan, S. H., & Iqbal, J. (2016). Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 44(1), 359-369.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1079527.
Kovanda, L., Zhang, W., Wei, X., Luo, J., Wu, X., Atwill, E. R., & Liu, Y. (2019). In vitro antimicrobial activities of organic acids and their derivatives on several species of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Molecules, 24(20), 3770. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24203770.
Mantzios, T., Tsiouris, V., Papadopoulos, G. A., Economou, V., Petridou, E., Brellou, G. D., & Fortomaris, P. (2023). Investigation of the effect of three commercial water acidifiers on the performance, gut health, and campylobacter jejuni colonization in experimentally challenged broiler chicks. Animals, 13(12), 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13122037. ‏
Marín-Flamand, E., Vázquez-Durán, A., & Méndez-Albores, A. (2014). Effect of organic acid blends in drinking water on growth performance, blood constituents and immune response of broiler chickens. The Journal of Poultry Science, 51(2), 144-150.‏ https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0120179.
Ma, J., Wang, J., Mahfuz, S., Long, S., Wu, D., Gao, J., & Piao, X. (2021). Supplementation of mixed organic acids improves growth performance, meat quality, gut morphology and volatile fatty acids of broiler chicken. Animals, 11(11), 3020.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113020.
Mustafa, A., Bai, S., Zeng, Q., Ding, X., Wang, J., Xuan, Y., & Zhang, K. (2021). Effect of organic acids on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and immunity of broiler chickens with and without coccidial challenge. AMB Express, 11, 1-18.‏ https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s13568-021-01299-1.
Nourmohammadi, R., Hosseini, S. M., & Farhangfar, H. (2010). Effect of dietary acidification on some blood parameters and weekly performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 9(24), 3092-3097. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.3092.3097.
Palamidi, I., & Mountzouris, K. C. (2018). Diet supplementation with an organic acids-based formulation affects gut microbiota and expression of gut barrier genes in broilers. Animal Nutrition, 4(4), 367-377.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.007.
Pandey, A. K., Kumar, P., & Saxena, M. J. (2019). Feed additives in animal health. Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine, 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04624-8_23.
Pham, V. H., Abbas, W., Huang, J., He, Q., Zhen, W., Guo, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). Effect of blending encapsulated essential oils and organic acids as an antibiotic growth promoter alternative on growth performance and intestinal health in broilers with necrotic enteritis. Poultry Science, 101(1), 101563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101563.
Rahnama Ghaleroudkhani, M., Mohiti Asli, M., & Khalilvandi Behruzyar, H. (2022). Effect of administrating an encapsulated blend of organic acids in drinking water on growth performance and small intestine microflora of broiler chickens. Animal Production Research, 11(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.22124/AR.2022.18596.1587. (In Persian).
Sadeghian, Z., Kazemi Fard, M., Rezaei, M., & Jafarpour, S. A. (2023). Effect of encapsulated organic acids on intestinal microbial population, blood parameters, digestibility of nutrients, carcass characteristics and performance of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 15(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/ 10.22067/IJASR.2022.75043.1065. (In Persian).
Samanta, S., Haldar, S., & Ghosh, T. K. (2010). Comparative efficacy of an organic acid blend and bacitracin methylene disalicylate as growth promoters in broiler chickens: effects on performance, gut histology, and small intestinal milieu. Veterinary Medicine International, (1), 645150.‏ https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/645150.
Serrano-Gamboa, M. Y., Arce-Menocal, J., Ávila-González, E., López-Coello, C., Garibay-Torres, L., & Herrera-Camacho, J. (2023). Organic acids for broilers: Effects on intestinal morphology and growth performance. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 36(2), 55-65.‏ https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v36n2a1.
Smith, J. E. (1995). Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, PJ Quinn, ME Carter, BK Markey, GR Carter (Eds.), Wolfe Publishing, London (1994), ISBN: 0-7234-1711-3.‏
Stefanello, C., Rosa, D. P., Dalmoro, Y. K., Segatto, A. L., Vieira, M. S., Moraes, M. L., & Santin, E. (2020). Protected blend of organic acids and essential oils improves growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health of broiler chickens undergoing an intestinal challenge. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 491.‏ https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00491.
Sultan, A., Ullah, I., Khan, S., Khan, R. U., & ul Hassan, Z. (2014). Impact of chlorine dioxide as water acidifying agent on the performance, ileal microflora and intestinal histology in quails. Archives Animal Breeding, 57(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-031.
Taherpour, K., Moravej, H., Shivazad, M., Adibmoradi, M., & Yakhchali, B. (2009). Effects of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and butyric acid glycerides on performance and serum composition in broiler chickens. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(10).‏2329-2334. https://doi.org/10.4314/AJB.V8I10.60590.
Vieira, S. L., Berres, J., Reis, R. N., Oyarzabal, O. A., Coneglian, J. L. B., Freitas, D. M. D., & Torres, C. A. (2008). Studies with sanguinarine like alkaloids as feed additive in broiler diets. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 10, 67-71.‏ https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000100010.
Vlaicu, P. A., Panaite, T. D., Untea, A. E., Idriceanu, L., & Cornescu, G. M. (2021). Herbal plants as feed additives in broiler chicken diets. Archiva Zootechnica, 24(2), 76-95.‏ https://doi.org/10.2478/azibna-2021-0015.
Vale, M. M. D., Menten, J. F. M., Morais, S. C. D. D., & Brainer, M. M. D. A. (2004). Mixture of formic and propionic acid as additives in broiler feeds. Scientia Agricola, 61, 371-375.‏ https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000400004.
Vinolya, R. E., Balakrishnan, U., Yasir, B., & Chandrasekar, S. (2021). Effect of dietary supplementation of acidifiers and essential oils on growth performance and intestinal health of broiler. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 30(3), 100179.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2021.100179.
Wang, J. P., Yoo, J. S., Lee, J. H., Zhou, T. X., Jang, H. D., Kim, H. J., & Kim, I. H. (2009). Effects of phenyllactic acid on production performance, egg quality parameters, and blood characteristics in laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 18(2), 203-209.‏ https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00071.