Evaluation of probiotic Bacillus coagulans DSM 32016 effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, health indices, blood metabolites, and immune status of Holstein dairy calves

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, karaj, Iran

Abstract

The present experiment was designed to investigate the effects of probiotic Bacillus coagulans DSM 32016 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, health indicators and serum metabolites of Holstein calves. Sixty Holstein calves, with from day 4 to day 73 of age were divided to the following two treatments as controls: no probiotic supplementation, probiotic Bacillus coagulans: 600 mg per kg of feed + 600 mg per kg of milk. was evaluated in two phases, 1 to 50 days and 51 to 70 days, factors as growth performance, nutrient digestibility, health indices, blood metabolites, and immune status. Compared to the control, dry matter consumption, average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency, and Height change did not differ significantly while the digestibility of nutrients was affected by probiotics (P< 0.05). Calves that received the probiotic, NDF digestibility had decreased compared to the control (P<0.05), while NFC increased with probiotic supplementation (P< 0.05). Health indicators and fecal score were more favorable with probiotic supplement than the control in both periods (P< 0.05). However, days with fever in both periods, and rectal temperature on days 51 to 70 were significantly reduced. Compared to the control, the level of glucose, beta-hydroxybutyrate and lymphocytes increased, and the level of neutrophils and the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes decreased during days 51 to 70 with the probiotic supplement. Therefore, the use of probiotic Bacillus coagulans DSM 32016 in milk and feed increases the digestibility of NFC and improves the fecal score and health indicators and increases the level of lymphocytes and immunity.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Extended Abstract

Introduction

In the commercial dairy farms, the health risks of young calves prior to weaning are the main concerns due to calves in this period are susceptible to diseases such as acute diarrhea and respiratory disease and environmental stress always endangers the health of animals. Antibiotics are widely used to prevent these unfavorable conditions and treat infections of the gastrointestinal tract of calves. However, over-use of antibiotics in livestock promotes antibiotic resistance, which has a long-term effect on the animal body and also disturbs the intestinal microflora balance. Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that have health benefits on the host animal by improving the colonization and recovery of the beneficial microbiota of the digestive tract and promoting nutrient absorption. Probiotics are capable to eliminate the toxins of pathogens using their produced end-products such as organic acids and bacteriocins. The use of probiotics in ruminants improved feed intake and growth performance and immune status. Moreover, probiotics supplemented to animals resulted in greater villi height and ratio of villi height to crypt depth.

   Bacillus coagulans is a Gram-positive, anaerobic, non-pathogenic, spore-forming bacterium and produces lactic acid in metabolism and its spores are activated in the stomach, and grow and multiply in the animal’s intestine that benefits animal health. Therefore, it seems necessary to investigate the effect of Bacillus coagulans probiotic on growth performance, immune system and health status of Holstein calves.

 

Objective

There is great interest in using probiotics as an alternative approach to antibiotics to control bacterial diseases in livestock production. There is not sufficient information the effect of Bacillus coagulans probiotic on growth performance, immune system and health status of calves. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the use of Bacillus coagulans probiotic in feed and milk may have beneficial effects on Holstein calves performance and commercial dairy farms.

 

Materials and methods

Sixty Holstein calves, with an average body weight (BW) of 40.02 ± 1.85 kg (SD), from day 4 to day 73 of age were divided to the following two treatments as controls: no probiotic supplementation, BC: 600 mg of probiotic per kg of feed + 600 mg of probiotic per kg of milk. Was evaluated in two phases, 1 to 50 days and 51 to 70 days. Calf health was checked daily by a blind veterinarian to experimental treatments and sick calves were treated by a veterinarian accordingly. Calves were healthy with no clinical signs of systemic disease or mortality throughout the experiment.

Data for dry matter intake, growth performance, health indices, and serum metabolites were analyzed for two discrete periods from d 1 to 50, and from d 51 to 70 of experiment using the MIXED MODEL procedure. Data of nutrient digestibilities and health indices (treated days, days with diarrhea, and days with fever) were considered as single measurements and were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS.

 

Results and Discussion

The results showed that compared to the control, dry matter consumption, average daily increase, feed efficiency, and height change during the experiment did not differ significantly (P < 0.05), while the digestibility of nutrients was affected by probiotics (P < 0.05). Calves that received the probiotic Bacillus coagulans DSM 32016 in milk and feed, NDF digestibility had decreased compared to the control (P < 0.05), while NFC increased with probiotic supplementation (P < 0.05). Health indicators such as eye, ear, nose and stool scores were more favorable with Bacillus coagulans probiotic supplement than the control in both periods (P < 0.05). The number of days treated with antibiotics and electrolytes was similar between the groups. However, days with fever in both periods, and rectal temperature on days 51 to 70 were significantly reduced with Bacillus coagulans probiotic supplementation. Compared to the control, the level of glucose, beta-hydroxybutyrate and lymphocytes increased in the Clavus probiotic supplement, and the level of neutrophils and the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes decreased during days 51 to 70 with the supplement.

   Previous studies have shown that the addition of Bacillus coagulans had positive effects on the growth performance and intestinal bacteria of weaned piglets and had good application prospects for replacing antibiotics. Studies have also shown that the use of Bacillus coagulans probiotic in poultry improved egg quality and reduce mortality.

 

Conclusion

The results of the current study showed that feeding of Bacillus coagulans DSM 32016 probiotic causes improved the faecal score and health indices, none-fibre carbohydrate digestibility, and increased lymphocytes levels of Holstein calves which suggesting the improved immune response for calves supplemented with probiotic, decreased  signs of diseases like diarrhea and the positive effect on the intestinal flora.

 

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, X.X. and Y.Y.; methodology, X.X.; software, X.X.; validation, X.X., Y.Y. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, X.X.; investigation, X.X.; resources, X.X.; data curation, X.X.; writing—original draft preparation, X.X.; writing—review and editing, X.X.; visualization, X.X.; supervision, X.X.; project administration, X.X.; funding acquisition, Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.” Please turn to the CRediT taxonomy for the term explanation. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work re-ported.

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

In this section, please provide details regarding where data supporting reported results can be found, including links to publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study (see examples). Data available on request from the authors.

If the study did not report any data, you might add “Not applicable” here.

Acknowledgements

The Acknowledgments section should be a few sentences at the end, but it is important to recognize those people (organizations and individuals) who made considerable impact on the research, provided significant help to the author to formulate and complete the experiment, and improved the research at any stage (from providing access to equipment or field sites to editing the manuscript). However, this is an optional section.

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

The authors would like to thank all participants of the present study.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of ABCD (Ethical code: IR.UT.RES.2024.500). The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

RERERENCES
Abdallah, A., Elemba, E., Zhong, Q., & Sun, Z. (2020). Gastrointestinal interaction between dietary amino acids and gut microbiota: with special emphasis on host nutrition. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 21(8), 785-798.
Abe, F., Ishibashi, N., & Shimamura, S. (1995). Effect of administration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets. Journal of dairy science, 78(12), 2838-2846.
Agazzi, A., Tirloni, E., Stella, S., Maroccolo, S., Ripamonti, B., Bersani, C., ni Savoini, G. (2014). Effects of species-specific probiotic addition to milk replacer on calf health and performance during the first month of life. Annals of Animal Science, 14(1), 101.
Akagawa, Y., Ohnishi, Y., Takaya, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2016). Safety assessment of probiotic bacteria, Bacillus coagulans strain SANK70258, in rats. Fundamental Toxicological Sciences, 3(6), 243-250.
Alimirzaei, M., Alijoo, Y., Dehghan-Banadaky, M., & Eslamizad, M. (2020). The effects of feeding high or low milk levels in early life on growth performance, fecal microbial count and metabolic and inflammatory status of Holstein female calves. Animal, 14(2), 303-311.
Apas, A. L., Arena, M. E., Colombo, S., & Gonzalez, S. N. (2015). Probiotic administration modifies the milk fatty acid profile, intestinal morphology, and intestinal fatty acid profile of goats. Journal of dairy science, 98(1), 47-54.
Bermudez-Brito, M., Plaza-Díaz, J., Muñoz-Quezada, S., Gómez-Llorente, C., & Gil, A. (2012). Probiotic mechanisms of action. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 61(2), 160-174.
Boonmar, S., Bangtrakulnonth, A., Pornruangwong, S., Samosornsuk, S., Kaneko, K.-i., & Ogawa, M. (1998). Significant increase in antibiotic resistance of Salmonella isolates from human beings and chicken meat in Thailand. Veterinary Microbiology, 62(1), 73-80.
Cao, J., Yu, Z., Liu, W., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., Zhai, Q., & Chen, W. (2020). Probiotic characteristics of Bacillus coagulans and associated implications for human health and diseases. Journal of Functional Foods, 64, 103643.
Cavazzoni, V., Adami, A., & Castrovilli, C. (1998). Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic. British poultry science, 39(4), 526-529.
Chase, C. C. (2018). Enteric immunity: Happy gut, healthy animal. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice, 34(1), 1-18. 
Diao, Q., Zhang, R., & Fu, T. (2019). Review of strategies to promote rumen development in calves. Animals, 9(8), 490.
Du, R., Jiao, S., Dai, Y., An, J., Lv, J., Yan, X., Han, B. (2018). Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C-1 improves growth performance, stimulates GH/IGF-1, and regulates the gut microbiota of growth-retarded beef calves. Frontiers in microbiology, 9, 2006.
Fuller, R. (1989). Probiotics in man and animals. The Journal of applied bacteriology, 66(5), 365-378.
Galvão, K. N., Santos, J. E., Coscioni, A., Villaseñor, M., Sischo, W. M., & Berge, A. C. B. (2005). Effect of feeding live yeast products to calves with failure of passive transfer on performance and patterns of antibiotic resistance in fecal Escherichia coli. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 45(4), 427-440.
Geiger, A., Ward, S., Williams, C., Rude, B., Cabrera, C., Kalestch, K., & Voelz, B. (2014). Effects of increasing protein and energy in the milk replacer with or without direct-fed microbial supplementation on growth and performance of preweaned Holstein calves. Journal of dairy science, 97(11), 7212-7219.
Guo, X., Li, D., Lu, W., Piao, X., & Chen, X. (2006). Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs. Antonie van leeuwenhoek, 90, 139-146.
Hammon, H., Liermann, W., Frieten, D., & Koch, C. (2020). Importance of colostrum supply and milk feeding intensity on gastrointestinal and systemic development in calves. Animal, 14, s133-s143.
Harris, T., Liang, Y., Sharon, K., Sellers, M., Yoon, I., Scott, M., Ballou, M. (2017). Influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products, SmartCare in milk replacer and Original XPC in calf starter, on the performance and health of preweaned Holstein calves challenged with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. Journal of dairy science, 100(9), 7154-7164.
Hung, A. T., Lin, S.-Y., Yang, T.-Y., Chou, C.-K., Liu, H.-C., Lu, J.-J., Lien, T.-F. (2012). Effects of Bacillus coagulans ATCC 7050 on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and microflora composition in broiler chickens. Animal Production Science, 52(9), 874-879.
Hyronimus, Marrec, L., & Urdaci. (1998). Coagulin, a bacteriocin‐like inhibitory substance produced by Bacillus coagulans I4. Journal of applied microbiology, 85(1), 42-50.
Khajehdizaj, F. P., Taghizadeh, A., & Nobari, B. B. (2014). Effect of feeding microwave irradiated sorghum grain on nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation and serum metabolites in sheep. Livestock Science, 167, 161-170.
Kodali, V. P., & Sen, R. (2008). Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of an exopolysaccharide from a probiotic bacterium. Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology, 3(2), 245-251.
Le Marrec, C., Hyronimus, B., Bressollier, P., Verneuil, B., & Urdaci, M. C. (2000). Biochemical and genetic characterization of coagulin, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins, produced by Bacillus coagulans I4. Applied and environmental microbiology, 66(12), 5213-5220.
Lesmeister, K., & Heinrichs, A. (2004). Effects of corn processing on growth characteristics, rumen development, and rumen parameters in neonatal dairy calves. Journal of dairy science, 87(10), 3439-3450.
Lonkar, P., Harne, S., Kalorey, D., & Kurkure, N. (2005). Isolation, in vitro antibacterial activity, bacterial sensitivity and plasmid profile of Lactobacilli. Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 18(9), 1336-1342.
McDonnell, R. P., O’Doherty, J. V., Earley, B., Clarke, A. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2019). Effect of supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and/or β-glucans on performance, feeding behaviour and immune status of Holstein Friesian bull calves during the pre-and post-weaning periods. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 10, 1-17.
McGuirk, S. (2013). Calf Health Scoring Chart. University of Wisconsin, School of Veterinary Medicine.
Mingmongkolchai, S., & Panbangred, W. (2018). Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production. Journal of applied microbiology, 124(6), 1334-1346.
Morrison, S., Dawson, S., & Carson, A. (2010). The effects of mannan oligosaccharide and Streptococcus faecium addition to milk replacer on calf health and performance. Livestock Science, 131(2-3), 292-296.
Nagashima, K., Yasokawa, D., Abe, K., Nakagawa, R., Kitamura, T., Miura, T., & Kogawa, S. (2010). Effect of a Lactobacillus species on incidence of diarrhea in calves and change of the microflora associated with growth. Bioscience and microflora, 29(2), 97-110.
Novak, K., Davis, E., Wehnes, C., Shields, D., Coalson, J., Smith, A., & Rehberger, T. (2012). Effect of supplementation with an electrolyte containing a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial on immune development in dairy calves. Research in Veterinary Science, 92(3), 427-434.
Oikonomou, G., Teixeira, A. G. V., Foditsch, C., Bicalho, M. L., Machado, V. S., & Bicalho, R. C. (2013). Fecal microbial diversity in pre-weaned dairy calves as described by pyrosequencing of metagenomic 16S rDNA. Associations of Faecalibacterium species with health and growth. PloS one, 8(4), e63157.
Parhizkar, S., Zaghari, M., & Zhandi, M. (2022). Beneficial effect of Bacillus coagulans DSM 32016 on performance and productivity of broiler breeders. Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies, 10(1), 31-40.
Pinos-Rodríguez, J., González, S., Mendoza, G., Bárcena, R., Cobos, M., Hernández, A., & Ortega, M. (2002). Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of alfalfa and rye-grass hay fed to lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 80(11), 3016-3020.
Pinto, M. G. V., Gómez, M. R., Seifert, S., Watzl, B., Holzapfel, W. H., & Franz, C. M. (2009). Lactobacilli stimulate the innate immune response and modulate the TLR expression of HT29 intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. International journal of food microbiology, 133(1-2), 86-93.
Riazi, S., Wirawan, R., Badmaev, V., & Chikindas, M. (2009). Characterization of lactosporin, a novel antimicrobial protein produced by Bacillus coagulans ATCC 7050. Journal of applied microbiology, 106(4), 1370-1377.
Ripamonti, B., Agazzi, A., Baldi, A., Balzaretti, C., Bersani, C., Pirani, S., Stenico, A. (2009). Administration of Bacillus coagulans in calves: recovery from faecal samples and evaluation of functional aspects of spores. Veterinary Research Communications, 33, 991-1001.
Sánchez, B., Delgado, S., Blanco‐Míguez, A., Lourenço, A., Gueimonde, M., & Margolles, A. (2017). Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Molecular nutrition & food research, 61(1), 1600240.
SAS Institute 2013. SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
Schofield, B. J., Lachner, N., Le, O. T., McNeill, D. M., Dart, P., Ouwerkerk, D., Klieve, A. V. (2018). Beneficial changes in rumen bacterial community profile in sheep and dairy calves as a result of feeding the probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens H57. Journal of applied microbiology, 124(3), 855-866.
Sun, T., Miao, H., Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Jiao, P., Huang, Z. (2022). Effect of dietary Bacillus coagulans on the performance and intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets. Animal, 16(7), 100561
Swanson, J., & Morrow-Tesch, J. (2001). Cattle transport: Historical, research, and future perspectives. Journal of Animal Science, 79(suppl_E), E102-E109.
Timmerman, H. M., Mulder, L., Everts, H., van Espen, D. C., van der Wal, E., Klaassen, G., Beynen, A. C. (2005). Health and growth of veal calves fed milk replacers with or without probiotics. J Dairy Sci, 88(6), 2154-2165. jds.S0022-0302(05)72891-5
Van Keulen, J., & Young, B. (1977). Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science, 44(2), 282-287.
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74(10), 3583-3597. jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Von Konigslow, T., Renaud, D., Duffield, T., Higginson, V., & Kelton, D. (2019). Validation of an automated cell counter to determine leukocyte differential counts in neonatal Holstein calves. Journal of dairy science, 102(8), 7445-7452.
Wagner, D., Quinonez, J., & Bush, L. (1990). The effect of corn-or wheat-based diets and yeast culture on performance, ruminal pH, and volatile fatty acids in dairy calves. Agri-Practice, 11(2), 7-12.
World Health Organization. Antibacterial agents in clinical development. Geneva; 2017.
Xie, S., Zhang, H., Matjeke, R. S., Zhao, J., & Yu, Q. (2022). Bacillus coagulans protect against Salmonella enteritidis-induced intestinal mucosal damage in young chickens by inducing the differentiation of goblet cells. Poultry Science, 101(3), 101639.
Xu, H., Huang, W., Hou, Q., Kwok, L.-y., Sun, Z., Ma, H., Zhang, H. (2017). The effects of probiotics administration on the milk production, milk components and fecal bacteria microbiota of dairy cows. Science Bulletin, 62(11), 767-774.
Zhang, L., Jiang, X., Liu, X., Zhao, X., Liu, S., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Growth, health, rumen fermentation, and bacterial community of Holstein calves fed Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during the preweaning stage. Journal of Animal Science, 97(6), 2598-2608.
Zhang, Y., Wu, S., Ma, J., Xia, Y., Ai, X., & Sun, J. (2015). Bacterial protein AvrA stabilizes intestinal epithelial tight junctions via blockage of the C-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway. Tissue Barriers, 3(1-2), e972849.
Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Gu, Q., & Li, W. (2010). Effect of dietary probiotic, Bacillus coagulans, on growth performance, chemical composition, and meat quality of Guangxi Yellow chicken. Poultry Science, 89(3), 588-593.
Zhou, Y., Zeng, Z., Xu, Y., Ying, J., Wang, B., Majeed, M., Li, W. (2020). Application of Bacillus coagulans in animal husbandry and its underlying mechanisms. Animals, 10(3), 454.