Effect of supplementing diet with zeolite coated with silver nanoparticles on performance, intestinal morphology characteristics and ilium microbial population of broiler chickens

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M. Sc Student, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Nanotechnology Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Karaj, Iran

4 Professor, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

5 Associate Professor, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

6 Ph. D. Student, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of supplementing the diet with zeolite coated with silvernanoparticles  on performance, intestinal morphology characteristics and ilium microbial population of broiler chickens in a completely randomized design with 375 day-old broiler chicks with five replicates per treatment and 15 chicks per replicate.Treatments were: 1) basal diet, 2) basal diet supplemented with1% zeoliteand 3, 4, and 5) basal diet supplemented with1% zeolitecoated and 0.25%, 0.5% and 0.75% nanosilver. Results showed that dietary supplementation with 1% zeolite and all level of silver nanoparticles had better feed conversion ratio than the basal diet on d 22-42  (P<0.05). Diets supplemented with silver nanoparticles at 0.5% and 0.75% level increased villi length and villus/crypt ratio significantly compared to the basal diet (P<0.05). In comparison to the basal diet, diets supplemented with silver nanoparticles decreased crypt depth. On d 21, broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with 0.5% and 0.75% silver nanoparticles had lower coliforms bacteria population compared with basal diet and basal diet supplemented with 1% zeolite (P<0.05). In conclusion, the present results showed that zeolite coated with silvernanoparticles can improve feed conversion ratio, intestinal morphological characters and decrease coliforms population in broiler chickens and it can be considered as a growth and health promoters.

Keywords


  1. Ahmadi, F. & Hafsi Kurdestany, A. (2010). The impact of silver nano particles on growth performance, lymphoid organs and oxidative stress indicators in broiler chicks. Global Veterinaria, 5, 366-370.
  2. Ahmadi, J. (2009). Application of different levels of silver nanoparticles in food on the performance and some blood parameters of broiler chickens. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7, 24-27.
  3. Ahmadi, J., Irani, M. & Choobchian, M. (2009). Pathological study of intestinal and liver in broiler chickens after treatment with different levels of silver nanoparticles. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7, 28-32.
  4. Chiou, P. W. S., Lu, T. W., Hsu, J. C. & Yu, B. (1996). Effect of different sources of fiber on the intestinal morphology of domestic geese. Asia- Aust Journal Animal Science, 4, 539-550.
  5. Cho, K. H., Park, J. E., Osaka, T. & Park, S. G. (2005). The study of antimicrobial activity and preservative effects of nanosilver ingredient.  Electrochimica Acta, 15, 956-960.
  6. Choi, O., Clevenger, T. E., Deng, B., Surampalli, R.Y., Ross, J. L. & Hu, Z. (2009). Role of sulfide and ligand strength in controlling nanosilver toxicity. Water Research, 43, 1879-1886.
  7. Cobb-Vantress. (2012). Cobb 500 broiler manual. From: http://www.cobb-vantress.com.
  8. Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11, 1-42.
  9. Fondevila, M., Herrer, R., Casallas, M. C., Abecia, L. & Duchab, J. J. (2008). Silver nanoparticles as a potential antimicrobial additive for weaned pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 150, 259-269.
  10. Ghoodrat, A., Ila, N. & Salehi, M. (2009). Evaluation of feeding effects silver nanoparticles and probiotics and their reaction on performance of broilers chickens. Animal Science and Research Journal, 4, 11-17. (in Farsi)
  11. Hashemi, S. R. & Davoodi, H.(2011). Herbal plants and their derivatives as growth and health promoters in animal nutrition. Veterinary Research Communications, 35, 180-169.
  12. Hashemi, S. R., Davoodi, D., Dastar, B., Bolandi, N., Smaili, M. & Mastani, R. (2014a). Meat quality attributes of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with silver nanoparticles coated on zeolite. Poultry Science Journal, 2, 183-193. 
  13. Hashemi, S. R., Zulkifli, I., Davoodi, H., Hair Bejo, M. & Loh, T. C. (2014b). Intestinal histomorphology changes and serum biochemistry responses of broiler chickens fed herbal plant (euphorbia hirta) and mix of acidifier. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4, 95-103.
  14. Incharoen, T., Khambualai, O. & Yamauchi, k. (2009). Performance and histological changes of intestinal villi in chichens fed dietary natural zeolite in cluding plant extract. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 3, 42-50.
  15. Lok C.N., Ho, C. M., Chen. R., He. Q. Y., Yu, W. Y., Sun, H. (2007). Silver nanoparticles: partial oxidation and antibacterial activities. Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, 12, 527-53.
  16. Ma, Y. L. & Guo, T. (2008). Intestinal morphology, brush border and digesta enzyme activities of broilers fed on a diet containing Cu2+-loaded montmorillonite. British Poultry Science, 49, 65-73.
  17. Maneewan, B. & Yamauchi, K. (2005). Recovery of duodenal villi and cell in chickens refed protein, carbohydrate and fat. British Poultry Science, 46, 415-423.
  18. Montagne, L., Pluske, J. R. & Hampson, D. J. (2003). A review of interactions between dietary fiber and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 108, 95-117.
  19. Morones, J. R., Elechiguerra, J. L., Camacho, A., Holt, K., Kouri, J. B., Ramirez, J. T. & Yacaman, M. J. (2005). The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 16, 2346-2353.
  20. Mumpton, F. A. & Fishman, P. H. (1977). The application of zeolite in animal science and aquaculture. Journal of Animal Science, 45, 1188-1203.
  21. Naghizadeh, F., Karimi Torshizi, M. A. & Rahimi, S. (2011). Comparison of nanosilver and in feed disinfectants on layer performance and intestinal microflora and yolk cholesterol. Journal of Animal Production, 13, 48-59. (in Farsi)
  22. Naghizadeh, M. & Karimi Torshizi, M. A. (2013). Evaluation of nano silver as an antibiotics alternative on performance and intestinal morphometric parameters of broilers chickens. Journal of Animal Science, 44, 255-262. (in Farsi)
  23. National Research Council. (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. (9th rev. ed.) National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  24. Palic, T., Vukicevice, O., Resanovic, R. & Rajic, I. (1993). Possible applications of natural zeolite in poultry production. Poultry Science, 021-0021300.
  25. Park, Y. K., Monaco, M. M. & Donovan, S. M. (1998). Delivery of total parenteral nutrition via umbilical catheterization: development of a piglet model to during TPN. Biology of the Neonate, 73, 295-305.
  26. Petunkin, N. (1991). Influence of zeolite on animal digestion in: Occurrence properties and utilization of natural zeolite. Havana Cuba, P. 280.
  27. Pineda, L., Chwalibog, A. Sawosz, E., Lauridsen, C., Engberg, R., Elnif, J., Hotowy, A., Sawosz, F., Gao, Y., Ali, A. & Sepehri Moghaddam, H. (2012). Effect of silver nanoparticles on growth performance, metabolism and microbial profile of broiler chickens. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 66, 416-429.
  28. Roshanai, K., Razavian, M. H., Ahmadi, R., Heidarieh, N. & Masaeemanesh, M. B. (2012). The effect of silvernano oral consumption on some hormonal, hematological and urine parameters of Vistar rats. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal, 6, 65-70. (in Farsi)
  29. Safaei Katuli, M., Boldaji, F., Dastar, B. & Hassani, S. (2010). The effect of dietary silicate minerals supplementation on apparent ileal digestibility of energy and protein in broiler chickens. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14, 299-302.
  30. SAS Institute. (2003). SAS/STAT® Users guide, Release 9.1 edition. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
  31. Shabani, A., Dastar, B., Khomeiri, M., Shabanpurand, B. & Hassani, S. (2011). Reduction effect of aflatoxicosis on the growth performance, blood protein and lipid concentration and gastro intestinal bacterial broilers fed nanozeolite. Journal of Animal Science Researches, 21, 117-127. (in Farsi)
  32. Shabani, A., Dastar, B., Khomeiri, M., Shabanpurand, B. & Hassani, S. (2010). Effect of nanozeolite on performance, some blood parameters and ileal bacteria population in broiler chicks fed aflatoxin contaminated diets. Journal of Animal Production, 2, 58-68. (in Farsi)
  33. Zargarn Esfahani, H., Sharifi, S. D., Brin, A. & Afzalzadeh, A. (2010). The effects of Silver Nanoparticles on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 2, 137-143. (in Farsi)