Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for identification of gene networks related to marbling in beef cattle

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shahid Bahonar, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Marbling, or intramuscular fat, is a critical quality trait in beef cattle, directly influencing flavor, juiciness, and tenderness, and significantly contributing to the economic value and marketability of beef. This Meta-analysis aimed to identify genomic regions and gene networks associated with marbling in beef cattle. By integrating data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and gene network analyses, we investigated genomic regions and candidate genes affecting this trait. Data were collected from reputable scientific databases, standardized, and analyzed using Fisher’s and Stouffer’s statistical methods to enhance statistical power. The Results revealed that chromosome 15, harboring the CADM1 gene with the highest significance level (-log10(p) = 29.24), plays a pivotal role in regulating marbling. Additionally, chromosomes 1, 2, 12, 17, 19, and 24 were also identified as key regions containing genes involved in lipid metabolism and immune response. Gene coexpression network analysis identified two hub genes, CLEC12A and CD69, on chromosome 5, which regulate biological pathways including lipid metabolism, immune regulation, cellular signaling, and transcriptional control. The observed scale-free network structure demonstrated biological stability and flexibility. These findings provide opportunities for developing molecular markers for targeted genomic selection, enhancing beef quality and increasing the global competitiveness of the beef industry. Future studies leveraging whole-genome sequencing and multi-omics analyses may further refine these results.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Extended Abstract

Introduction

Livestock production represents one of the most crucial economic sectors globally, with beef cattle farming holding particular importance for food security and rural development. Marbling, defined as the intramuscular fat distribution pattern in beef, has emerged as a critical quality indicator that determines both the economic value and consumer acceptance of beef products. This complex polygenic trait directly influences meat tenderness, juiciness, and flavor profile, making it a primary target for genetic improvement programs. Understanding the molecular mechanisms controlling marbling quality is essential for developing targeted breeding strategies that can enhance meat quality and improve the competitiveness of the beef industry.

Materials and Methods

 

Literature Search and Study Selection

The study employed a systematic meta-analytical approach to identify genomic regions significantly associated with marbling traits in beef cattle. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major scientific databases including Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, focusing on publications from 2010 to 2025 that examined relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and marbling-related traits. Inclusion criteria encompassed original research articles reporting associations between SNPs and marbling traits with precise statistical data.

Genomic Interval Analysis and Meta-Analysis

The methodological framework involved systematic data extraction and standardization procedures to ensure compatibility across different studies. Key parameters including trait descriptions, SNP identifiers, chromosome numbers, genomic positions, sample sizes, candidate genes, and p-values were systematically extracted and standardized using Microsoft Excel. For studies presenting graphical data without direct numerical values, WebPlotDigitizer software (version 4.6) was employed for precise data extraction. Genomic positions were standardized to the UMD3.1 bovine reference genome assembly, trait nomenclatures were harmonized to prevent inconsistencies, and p-values were recalculated where necessary when reported as -log10(p-value) formats. Incomplete or non-standardizable data (such as cases with insufficient information about genomic positions or sample sizes) were excluded from analyses to maintain input data quality.

Standardization of Genomic Coordinates and Meta-Analysis Procedures

Genomic positions were standardized to the UMD3.1 bovine reference genome assembly, and SNPs located within 5000 kilobase distances were grouped into unified intervals. Meta-analytical procedures employed both Fisher’s method and Stouffer’s method to combine p-values within each interval. Gene network analysis was performed using the STRING database (version 12.0) with a focus on Bos taurus species, examining gene interactions with medium confidence thresholds. Manhattan plots were generated using R software to visualize the distribution of significant genomic regions.

Results

The meta-analytical approach demonstrated substantial advantages over individual studies in identifying genomic regions associated with marbling traits. Through integration of multiple datasets, the effective sample size increased significantly, resulting in enhanced statistical power and improved precision in quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection. The combined analysis successfully identified 17 significant genomic regions across 14 different chromosomes, with combined-log10(p-value) values (Stouffer’s method) ranging from 8.39 to 29.24.

The most prominent finding was the CADM1 gene on chromosome 15 with the highest significance level (-log10(p) = 29.24). Additionally, large clusters of immune system-related genes were identified on chromosomes 5 and 19, playing important roles in marbling regulation. Manhattan plot analysis revealed that the combined analysis showed dramatic differences compared to individual studies, with stronger peaks observed, particularly on chromosome 15. Chromosomes 2, 12, 17, 19, and 24 also presented significant peaks in the range of -log10(p) = 20-27.

Gene co-expression network analysis revealed sophisticated molecular mechanisms underlying marbling control. CLEC12A emerged as the primary hub gene of the network, with extensive direct interactions with numerous other genes. This gene, belonging to the C-type lectin family, functions as a central regulator in multiple biological pathways. CD69 was also identified as a secondary hub gene interacting with genes such as BCL6 and KLRG1. The network analysis demonstrated that genes are organized into three main functional clusters: lipid metabolism, cellular regulation, and transcriptional control.

Discussion

The identification of key candidate genes, particularly CADM1 on chromosome 15 with the highest significance level, represents a prime candidate for targeted breeding programs due to its role in cellular adhesion and metabolic processes. The identification of the CLEC gene family clusters provides concrete targets for genomic selection programs aimed at improving meat quality. The comprehensive gene network analysis provided fundamental insights into the biological pathways controlling intramuscular fat deposition, revealing mechanisms including adipogenesis pathways, inflammatory regulation, and metabolic coordination.

The practical implications of these findings extend to the development of molecular markers for targeted genomic selection, potentially enhancing meat quality while maintaining production efficiency. The identified genetic variants can be incorporated into breeding value estimation systems, enabling more accurate prediction of marbling potential in breeding animals. These results provide a set of candidate genes for use in breeding programs to improve marbling traits, offering possibilities for developing molecular markers that can improve meat quality and increase competitiveness of the meat industry.

 

Conclusions

This comprehensive meta-analysis successfully identified 17 significant genomic intervals associated with marbling traits in beef cattle, providing valuable insights into the genetic architecture underlying this economically important trait. The integration of multiple studies through meta-analytical approaches significantly enhanced the detection power for genomic regions that remained undetectable in individual studies due to statistical limitations.

The study’s limitations include the focus on specific cattle breeds and the reliance on available published data, which may introduce publication bias. Future research directions should incorporate whole-genome sequencing data and multi-omics approaches to provide more comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying marbling traits. Validation studies in diverse cattle populations and environments will be essential to confirm the universal applicability of these findings across different production systems.

 

 Author Contributions

Ehsan Moazami: Data collection, Writing original draft of the manuscript, Data curation and organization, Data analysis, Investigation, and Methodology.

Ali Esmailizadeh: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision of all phases of the scientific work, Validation, and Review and Editing the manuscript.

Mohammad Reza Mohammadabadi: Supervision, Review and Editing the manuscript, Validation, and Contributing to better presentation of the scientific work.

Iman Moazemi: Data analysis assistance, Data acquisition and collection, Investigation, and Methodology support.

 Data Availability Statement

Not applicable. This study used data published online and published articles, all of which are publicly available.

 

Ethical considerations

Not applicable. The study used data published online and in printed articles and did not involve any living organisms.

REFERENCES
Akanno, E. C., Chen, L., Abo-Ismail, M. K., Crowley, J. J., Wang, Z., Li, C., Basarab, J. A., MacNeil, M. D., & Plastow, G. S. (2018). Genome-wide association scan for heterotic quantitative trait loci in multi-breed and crossbred beef cattle. Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE50(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0405-y
Arikawa, L. M., Mota, L. F. M., Schmidt, P. I., Frezarim, G. B., Fonseca, L. F. S., Magalhães, A. F. B., Silva, D. A., Carvalheiro, R., Chardulo, L. A. L., & Albuquerque, L. G. (2024). Genome-wide scans identify biological and metabolic pathways regulating carcass and meat quality traits in beef cattle. Meat science209, 109402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109402
Barabási, A. L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature reviews. Genetics5(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1272
Bhuiyan, M. S. A., Lim, D., Park, M., Lee, S., Kim, Y., Gondro, C., Park, B., & Lee, S. (2018). Functional Partitioning of Genomic Variance and Genome-Wide Association Study for Carcass Traits in Korean Hanwoo Cattle Using Imputed Sequence Level SNP Data. Frontiers in genetics9, 217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00217
Brandan, E., & Gutierrez, J. (2013). Role of skeletal muscle proteoglycans during myogenesis. Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology32(6), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2013.03.007
Eghtedari, M., Khezri, A., Kazemi-Bonchenari, M., Mohammadabadi, M., Esmaeili Mahani, S., & Aschenbach, J. R. (2025). Phosphorus has a crucial role in growth performance of calves fed starters with incorporated forage. Animal Nutrition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2025.01.012
Eghtedari, M., Khezri, A., Kazemi-Bonchenari, M., Yazdanyar, M., Mohammadabadi, M., Esmaeili Mahani, S., & Ghaffari, M. H. (2024). Effects of corn grain processing and phosphorus content in calf starters on intake, growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood metabolites, and urinary purine derivatives. Journal of Dairy Science, 107(11), 9334–9346. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25079
Glazier, A. M., Nadeau, J. H., & Aitman, T. J. (2002). Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science, 298(5602), 2345–2349. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076641
Hirschhorn, J. N., & Daly, M. J. (2005). Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1521
Hong, E. P., & Park, J. W. (2012). Sample size and statistical power calculation in genetic association studies. Genomics & informatics, 10(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2012.10.2.117
Hudson, N. J., Reverter, A., Griffiths, W. J., Yutuc, E., Wang, Y., Jeanes, A., McWilliam, S., Pethick, D. W., & Greenwood, P. L. (2020). Gene expression identifies metabolic and functional differences between intramuscular and subcutaneous adipocytes in cattle. BMC genomics, 21(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6505-4
Killinger, K. M., Calkins, C. R., Umberger, W. J., Feuz, D. M., & Eskridge, K. M. (2004). Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level. Journal of Animal Science, 82(11), 3294–3301. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82113294x
Kombolo-Ngah, M., Goi, A., Santinello, M., Rampado, N., Atanassova, S., Liu, J., Faure, P., Thoumy, L., Neveu, A., Andueza, D., De Marchi, M., & Hocquette, J. F. (2023). Across countries implementation of handheld near-infrared spectrometer for the on-line prediction of beef marbling in slaughterhouse. Meat science200, 109169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109169
Leal-Gutiérrez, J. D., Rezende, F. M., Reecy, J. M., Kramer, L. M., Peñagaricano, F., & Mateescu, R. G. (2020). Whole Genome Sequence Data Provides Novel Insights Into the Genetic Architecture of Meat Quality Traits in Beef. Frontiers in genetics11, 538640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.538640
Lee, S. H., van der Werf, J. H. J., Kim, N. K., Lee, S. H., Gondro, C., Park, E. W., Oh, S. J., Gibson, J. P., & Thompson, J. M. (2011). QTL and gene expression analyses identify genes affecting carcass weight and marbling on BTA14 in Hanwoo (Korean cattle). Mammalian Genome, 22(9–10), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9331-9
Lim, D., Kim, N. K., Lee, S. H., Park, H. S., Cho, Y. M., Chai, H. H., & Kim, H. (2014). Characterization of genes for beef marbling based on applying gene coexpression network. International journal of genomics, 2014, 708562. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/708562
MacPhillamy, C., Ren, Y., Chen, T., Hiendleder, S., & Low, W. Y. (2023). MicroRNA breed and parent-of-origin effects provide insights into biological pathways differentiating cattle subspecies in fetal liver. Frontiers in genetics, 14, 1329939. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1329939
Magalhães, A. F., de Camargo, G. M., Fernandes, G. A., Junior, Gordo, D. G., Tonussi, R. L., Costa, R. B., Espigolan, R., Silva, R. M., Bresolin, T., de Andrade, W. B., Takada, L., Feitosa, F. L., Baldi, F., Carvalheiro, R., Chardulo, L. A., & de Albuquerque, L. G. (2016). Genome-Wide Association Study of Meat Quality Traits in Nellore Cattle. PloS one11(6), e0157845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157845
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., & DePristo, M. A. (2010). The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research, 20(9), 1297–1303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110
Nguyen, D. V., Nguyen, O. C., & Malau-Aduli, A. E. O. (2021). Main regulatory factors of marbling level in beef cattle. Veterinary and animal science, 14, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2021.100219
Nikolitsa, E. K., Kontou, P. I., & Bagos, P. G. (2025). metacp: a versatile software package for combining dependent or independent p-values. BMC Bioinformatics, 26, 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06126-z
Pickrell, J. K., Coop, G., Novembre, J., Kudaravalli, S., Li, J. Z., Absher, D., Srinivasan, B. S., Barsh, G. S., Myers, R. M., Feldman, M. W., & Pritchard, J. K. (2009). Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations. Genome Research, 19(5), 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.087577.108
Reis, H. B. D., Carvalho, M. E., Espigolan, R., Poleti, M. D., Ambrizi, D. R., Berton, M. P., Ferraz, J. B. S., de Mattos Oliveira, E. C., & Eler, J. P. (2024). Genome-Wide Association (GWAS) Applied to Carcass and Meat Traits of Nellore Cattle. Metabolites14(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14010006
Salleh, S. M., Mazzoni, G., Løvendahl, P., & Kadarmideen, H. N. (2018). Gene co-expression networks from RNA sequencing of dairy cattle identifies genes and pathways affecting feed efficiency. BMC bioinformatics, 19(1), 513. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2553-z
Sasazaki, S., Kondo, H., Moriishi, Y., Kawaguchi, F., Oyama, K., & Mannen, H. (2024). Comprehensive genotyping analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms responsible for beef marbling in Japanese Black cattle. BMC genomic data25(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-024-01199-w
Srikanth, K., Lee, S. H., Chung, K. Y., Park, J. E., Jang, G. W., Park, M. R., Kim, N. Y., Kim, T. H., Chai, H. H., Park, W. C., & Lim, D. (2020). A Gene-Set Enrichment and Protein-Protein Interaction Network-Based GWAS with Regulatory SNPs Identifies Candidate Genes and Pathways Associated with Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle. Genes11(3), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030316
Szklarczyk, D., Nastou, K., Koutrouli, M., Kirsch, R., Mehryary, F., Hachilif, R., Hu, D., Peluso, M. E., Huang, Q., Fang, T., Doncheva, N. T., Pyysalo, S., Bork, P., Jensen, L. J., & von Mering, C. (2025). The STRING database in 2025: Protein networks with directionality of regulation. Nucleic Acids Research, 53(D1), D730–D737. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1113
Taye, M., Lee, W., Jeon, S., Yoon, J., Dessie, T., Hanotte, O., Mwai, O. A., Kemp, S., Cho, S., Oh, S. J., Lee, H. K., & Kim, H. (2017). Exploring evidence of positive selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for different traits. Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society28(11-12), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-017-9715-6
Tian, R., Mahmoodi, M., Tian, J., Esmailizadeh Koshkoiyeh, S., Zhao, M., Saminzadeh, M., Li, H., Wang, X., Li, Y., & Esmailizadeh, A. (2024). Leveraging Functional Genomics for Understanding Beef Quality Complexities and Breeding Beef Cattle for Improved Meat Quality. Genes, 15(8), 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15081104
Velleman, S. G. (2012). Meat science and muscle biology symposium: Extracellular matrix regulation of skeletal muscle formation. Journal of Animal Science, 90(3), 936–941. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4575
Wang, M., & Xu, S. (2019). Statistical power in genome-wide association studies and quantitative trait locus mapping. Heredity, 123(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-019-0202-3
Wang, Q., Gao, B., Yue, X., Cui, Y., Loor, J. J., Dai, X., Wei, X., & Xu, C. (2022). Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis Identifies Specific Modules and Hub Genes Related to Subacute Ruminal Acidosis. Frontiers in veterinary science, 9, 897714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.897714
Wang, S., Liu, T., Peng, P., Fu, Y., Shi, S., Liang, S., Chen, X., Wang, K., & Zhou, R. (2025). Integrated Transcriptomic Analysis of Liver and Muscle Tissues Reveals Candidate Genes and Pathways Regulating Intramuscular Fat Deposition in Beef Cattle. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI15(9), 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15091306
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
Whitlock, M. C. (2005). Combining probability from independent tests: The weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher’s approach. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18(5), 1368–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00917.x
Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K., & Oshlack, A. (2010). Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome biology11(2), R14. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14
Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2005). A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology4, Article17. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1128