Document Type : Research Paper
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Sperm cryopreservation has significantly improved assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and has enabled the conservation of endangered dog breeds (Dalmazzo et al., 2018; Nguyen et al., 2019). However, a major challenge in cryopreservation is the risk of contamination from animal-derived components such as egg yolk or milk, which are commonly used in extenders (Bousseau et al., 1998). Egg yolk is widely known as a cryoprotectant that lowers the freezing point of the medium and reduces the formation of ice crystals (Farstad, 2000). Based on this, we hypothesized that a soy lecithin nanoliposome-based diluent would demonstrate better efficacy for canine sperm cryopreservation compared to a traditional egg yolk-based diluent. The development of such an optimal extender could improve canine sperm cryopreservation protocols for artificial insemination. However, the underlying cellular mechanisms through which egg yolk or soy lecithin affects in vivo fertility potential in dogs have not yet been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate a comprehensive set of parameters, including motility, morphological abnormalities and plasma membrane integrity, acrosome membrane integrity, and membrane activity to evaluate the optimal cryopreservation extender. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of soy lecithin nanoliposome on the quality of frozen-thawed Sarabi dog sperm.
Materials and methods
Semen samples were collected from three healthy Sarabi dogs aged 3 to 4 years. Semen collection was performed manually by an experienced technician. To stimulate sexual desire, the samples were collected in the presence of a female dog in heat. Immediately after collection, each ejaculate was evaluated for color, volume, concentration, sperm motility, viability (plasma membrane integrity), morphology, and motility. Evaluation parameters included sperm motility, abnormalities (Hancock), sperm membrane integrity (eosin-nigrosin), acrosome membrane integrity (PSA), and membrane activity (HASt) after freeze-thaw.
Results and Discussion
The results of this study showed that the L2 and EY groups had the highest total mobility (65.5 ± 1.8 and 66.7 ± 1.8), which were significantly different from the L1 group (58.2 ± 1.8). Also, the results of progressive mobility showed that the L2 group (55.5 ± 1.5) was significantly higher than the other groups, although there was no significant difference with the control treatment (52.3 ± 1.5) (P<0.05).
The results of eosin-nigrosin staining are given in Table 2. The results of this evaluation showed that the L2 treatments (69.5 ± 1.3) and the control group (62.1 ± 0.3) showed the highest cell membrane integrity, and no significant difference was observed between these two treatments (P < 0.05). The lowest percentage of cell membrane integrity was in the L3 group (53.1 ± 0.3), which showed a significant difference with the L2 and control groups (P < 0.05). The sperm acrosome integrity results are given in Table 2. This study showed that the treatment based on 2% soy lecithin nanoliposomes had the highest percentage of acrosome integrity (1.78 ± 2.2), which was significantly different from other nanoliposome-based treatments.
Conclusion
This study showed that an extender containing 2% lecithin nanoliposomes was highly effective for canine sperm cryopreservation. The positive results observed establish it as an effective plant-based alternative for canine sperm cryopreservation and cryopreservation protocols. Therefore, it appears that soy lecithin could be successfully used as a plant-based alternative to egg yolk-based extender in canine cryopreservation environments.
Author Contributions
Touba Nadri: Conceptualization, Validation, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Supervision, Formal analysis, Investigation.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the reported results are collected and used from published articles, to which we have referred in the manuscript.
Ethical considerations
The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.